I WAS WRONG.
Now that we've got that over with, I can move on.
And explain to you what I was so very, very wrong about.
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, that's what.
I thought it would be a sensationalistic, slightly trashy sex-soaked, middle-aged man's fantasy.
Well, it wasn't.
It was an incredibly intricate tale of corporate espionage, corruption, and a psychotic family. Even though I don't think it's quite the epic masterpiece of literature that will lead us into the Golden Age that it is occasionally described as, I did enjoy it, and look forward to reading the rest of the series.
Despite the graphic violence towards women, it wasn't nearly as gratuitous as I expected it to be. All the abusers of women were, generally, punished for their sins, and I think it's interesting that Larsson felt the need to include that. I actually don't think that criticisim of the book based on its portrayal of women is fair. To be honest, I find shows like CSI to have more gratuitous violence against women (how many Vegas strippers can that show realistically kill before they, you know, RUN OUT? I mean, strippers are not exactly an endless resource. Just saying.). The backstory of Lisbeth's character is certainly worth reading - when Larsson was a teenager, he saw a young woman (by the name of Lisbeth) being gang raped, and it haunted him for the rest of his life that he did not help her.
If anything, I think his portrayal of Lisbeth taking revenge on psychotic males to be fitting. Though it's true that at least in the first book women take it pretty bad, I think that punishment is doled out in plenty.
The character of Lisbeth Salander is the highlight of the book, for me. She's promiscuous but not judged for it, she's young but wiser than most people older than her, and she's a technological genius - but despite this, she's not a stereotype. She's not some Goth tech chick with a raging sex life who all the nerdy boys and FBI guns drool over. She's a damaged, psychologically flawed, and bitter little person with a crazy back story, and wicked need for revenge. While I'm not going to hail her as the start of a new wave of feminists heroes, I think it's just neat that she is a hero.
So, there you have it.
I apologize, Stieg Larsson.
(I still think there could a little less about the corporate corruption, but it was still good.)
Sincerely,
the Maybe Girl
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
Friday, June 3, 2011
Planet of Literary Guilt: The Austen Strikes Back
That delicious cloud of awesome permeating the air?
That, my friends, is the sweet taste of VICTORY and ACHIEVEMENT and ACCOMPLISHMENT and CHECKING OFF GOALS.
Because I, RR, have finally.
Finally.
FINALLY.
Read my first Jane Austen all the way through.
*Cheers of the crowd*
*Rocky anthem plays*
*Tasteful laser show*
*Fireworks spelling things like "AUSTEN", "RR", and "VICTORY"*
Persuasion, published in 1817, was the last book Jane Austen ever completed. With a heroine Anne Elliot whom Austen called "too good" for her.
Also, it is by far the easiest Austen to read because of a smaller cast and simpler plot than, say, Pride and Prejudice.
Basically, Persuasion is about forgiveness and enduring love (sigh).
So Anne is basically resigning herself to hanging out with her vain father, neurotic younger (married) sister, and older unmarried sister who is obviously their father's favourite, for the rest of her life. THEN!
LO AND BEHOLD:
Captain Frederick Wentworth, a Man From Anne's Foolish Youth, appears on the scene.
Annnnnnd we all pretty much can guess what happens in the end.
I am not going to summarize the book anymore because A) HOW CAN YOU NOT GUESS WHAT THE END IS, and B) this post is not actually about the sheer loveliness of reading Persuasion. It's about GOALS! ACCOMPLISHMENT!
And the sweet, sweet taste of victory.
Am I going to accomplish everything else on my Literary Goal list?
Um. Probably not.
But you can bet I am going to suck every bit of gratification out of the ones' I do get to check off.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have a celebratory parade to attend.
Yours, a thoroughly gorged on self-congratulation
RR
That, my friends, is the sweet taste of VICTORY and ACHIEVEMENT and ACCOMPLISHMENT and CHECKING OFF GOALS.
Because I, RR, have finally.
Finally.
FINALLY.
Read my first Jane Austen all the way through.
*Cheers of the crowd*
*Rocky anthem plays*
*Tasteful laser show*
*Fireworks spelling things like "AUSTEN", "RR", and "VICTORY"*
Persuasion, published in 1817, was the last book Jane Austen ever completed. With a heroine Anne Elliot whom Austen called "too good" for her.
Also, it is by far the easiest Austen to read because of a smaller cast and simpler plot than, say, Pride and Prejudice.
Basically, Persuasion is about forgiveness and enduring love (sigh).
So Anne is basically resigning herself to hanging out with her vain father, neurotic younger (married) sister, and older unmarried sister who is obviously their father's favourite, for the rest of her life. THEN!
LO AND BEHOLD:
Captain Frederick Wentworth, a Man From Anne's Foolish Youth, appears on the scene.
Annnnnnd we all pretty much can guess what happens in the end.
I am not going to summarize the book anymore because A) HOW CAN YOU NOT GUESS WHAT THE END IS, and B) this post is not actually about the sheer loveliness of reading Persuasion. It's about GOALS! ACCOMPLISHMENT!
And the sweet, sweet taste of victory.
Am I going to accomplish everything else on my Literary Goal list?
Um. Probably not.
But you can bet I am going to suck every bit of gratification out of the ones' I do get to check off.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have a celebratory parade to attend.
Yours, a thoroughly gorged on self-congratulation
RR
Monday, April 25, 2011
Bloody Bloodiness!
I was cruising through my stores of Drafted posts that have never borne Bloggy Fruits when I realized that I haven't written anything on the Bloody Jack books yet.
*Hits self on forehead*
The Bloody Jack series, by L. A. Meyer, is a trillion kinds of awesome. Seriously.
The first book is called Bloody Jack (no surprises there), and it is about a scrawny little girl named Mary who lives in London in the 1800s-ish. When she becomes an orphan, she joins a gang of kids running around London stealing drunk peoples' clothing and fighting other gangs. THEN, her buddy is killed by Muck, a creep who sells bodies to doctors, and Mary decides to leave the gang by dressing up as a boy, joining the Navy ship The Dolphin, and renaming herself Jacky. While in the Navy, she goes through puberty (she thinks she's dying at first), falls in love, and kills pirates and child molesters.
The second book is The Curse of the Blue Tattoo, and it's actually the first one in the series that I read. You KNOW a series is good when you can read the second one, and still follow the plot and like the characters. Jacky is punted off The Dolphin and sent to the Lawson Peabody School for Girls.
That's right, this gun-toting, shiv-wielding, spitting, swearing, skinny little pirate-killer is gonna become a bleedin' lady of manners and wot-not.
I am not going to get into the other seven or so books, but suffice to say, they are also really neat reads.
My Uncle R, who is pretty into 19th century sailing and ships and boats and stuff, also says the books are both really good and fairly accurate. I just find it neat that we can both read the same book and enjoy it equally.
I am just going to say this: I have read a LOT of books with kick-ass female protagonists, and if I were going to need backup or assistance or a friend from one of those books, I would pick Jacky Faber. (Or Hermione Granger. But that comparison's really not fair, because Hermione's magic....)
Jacky is a scrawny, smart, funny, brave-but-also-cowardly, snarky, sneaky, unforgettable little con-artist of a character. She's loyal, a bit of a hell-raiser, and tries to get along with everybody, except if they are evil/mean/cruel, in which case she concocts diabolical ways to get revenge on them.
The writing in the first half of the first book is a little funky because there are a hell of a lot of run on sentences much like this one, but they actually flow really well. I don't usually enjoy Streams of Consciousness, but I enjoy Jacky's. About midway through the first book, though, she starts to talk normally (as normal as 19th century pirate killer talk on Navy ships gets) because she starts to get some schoolin' in.
The thing that really gets me about this series is that even though it reads like a teenage girl telling you what's going on in her life, the series is actually written by L. A. Meyer, a fifty-year-old-ish guy in Maine. His website (linky goodness here) actually leads to either his art gallery's page or Jacky's page. Continue to Jacky's page! He sells autographed books for $24 (US, I think) and t-shirts (he actually makes them, and they are actually cool) for $24 (US again, I think).
Also, luckily for us all, there is a new book (9th in the series, I think) coming out in September.
Have at 'em, mates!
Captain Radical
*Hits self on forehead*
The Bloody Jack series, by L. A. Meyer, is a trillion kinds of awesome. Seriously.
The first book is called Bloody Jack (no surprises there), and it is about a scrawny little girl named Mary who lives in London in the 1800s-ish. When she becomes an orphan, she joins a gang of kids running around London stealing drunk peoples' clothing and fighting other gangs. THEN, her buddy is killed by Muck, a creep who sells bodies to doctors, and Mary decides to leave the gang by dressing up as a boy, joining the Navy ship The Dolphin, and renaming herself Jacky. While in the Navy, she goes through puberty (she thinks she's dying at first), falls in love, and kills pirates and child molesters.
The second book is The Curse of the Blue Tattoo, and it's actually the first one in the series that I read. You KNOW a series is good when you can read the second one, and still follow the plot and like the characters. Jacky is punted off The Dolphin and sent to the Lawson Peabody School for Girls.
That's right, this gun-toting, shiv-wielding, spitting, swearing, skinny little pirate-killer is gonna become a bleedin' lady of manners and wot-not.
I am not going to get into the other seven or so books, but suffice to say, they are also really neat reads.
My Uncle R, who is pretty into 19th century sailing and ships and boats and stuff, also says the books are both really good and fairly accurate. I just find it neat that we can both read the same book and enjoy it equally.
I am just going to say this: I have read a LOT of books with kick-ass female protagonists, and if I were going to need backup or assistance or a friend from one of those books, I would pick Jacky Faber. (Or Hermione Granger. But that comparison's really not fair, because Hermione's magic....)
Jacky is a scrawny, smart, funny, brave-but-also-cowardly, snarky, sneaky, unforgettable little con-artist of a character. She's loyal, a bit of a hell-raiser, and tries to get along with everybody, except if they are evil/mean/cruel, in which case she concocts diabolical ways to get revenge on them.
The writing in the first half of the first book is a little funky because there are a hell of a lot of run on sentences much like this one, but they actually flow really well. I don't usually enjoy Streams of Consciousness, but I enjoy Jacky's. About midway through the first book, though, she starts to talk normally (as normal as 19th century pirate killer talk on Navy ships gets) because she starts to get some schoolin' in.
The thing that really gets me about this series is that even though it reads like a teenage girl telling you what's going on in her life, the series is actually written by L. A. Meyer, a fifty-year-old-ish guy in Maine. His website (linky goodness here) actually leads to either his art gallery's page or Jacky's page. Continue to Jacky's page! He sells autographed books for $24 (US, I think) and t-shirts (he actually makes them, and they are actually cool) for $24 (US again, I think).
Also, luckily for us all, there is a new book (9th in the series, I think) coming out in September.
Have at 'em, mates!
Captain Radical
Friday, April 22, 2011
Bite Me, Timekeepers
*This is a post I started back when Daylights Savings Time had just started again and was screwing me up. This should alert you all to the time it takes between Blog Post Idea and Actual Legitimate Blog Post. I am like a snail. Persistent, slow... I think this analogy should end here.*
I am not afraid to say that Daylight Savings Time sucks.
While I am not totally opposed to the general idea or even the implementation, the actual doing of it irritates me. The idea that Time can change, that we affect how the already almost impossible to measure substance running our lives is counted kind of bamboozles my brain.
Another thing running around my brain is revolution. I've been reading books on the French Revolution lately, and it is... disorientating, to say the least, to be able to draw comparisons to present day events in the East, specifically Egypt and Libya.
The only book to come to mind concerning issues of time and political rebellion was Revolution, by Jennifer Donnelly.
Andi, a high school senior, is a pill-popping, emotionally traumatized musical prodigy supporting her mother through a mental breakdown after the death of her younger brother Truman. When her estranged father enters the scene, he swiftly makes a series of decisions that will change Andi's life forever. Putting her mother in a mental hospital to help her recover, he takes Andi to Paris with him for Christmas break, so he can supervise her senior project, and help identify a young boy's heart in a glass jar, rumoured to be that of the last Dauphin - possibly King - of France, Louis-Charles, or Louis XVI, the son of Marie Antoinette.
When Andi stumbles upon a diary from the years of the French Revolution, she is intrigued and captured by Alex, a young aspiring actor who takes a position as companion and joker for Louis-Charles, and later lights fireworks for him when he is imprisoned at the age of ten by the corrupt regime of Robespierre.
I did not expect to like this book as much as I did. I got it as a gift, and my first reaction was basically I liked the author (her earlier YA novel, A Northern Light? SO MANY KINDS OF AWESOMENESS), but the premise (time travel+teen angst) didn't seem particularly appealing.
SO WRONG. (Ah, how I love the taste of literary crow in the mornings..............)
Revolution was crazy good, not only because I love historical fiction (especially the French Revolution, for some reason) but because Andi is a really, really incredible character. She's tortured and moody, but it doesn't feel as tired and boring as the patented "Teenagers + Angst = Guilt + Depression" as a plot device usually is.
An interesting undercurrent and side-plot is Andi's music. She's a talented musician, focused mainly on guitar, and the music the author chooses to mention in the book (from Led Zeppelin to Debussy) never feel like it's just being thrown in to hook People Who Like Music; it just feels like an actual facet of Andi's character.
If you're interested in reading more about Jennifer Donnelly and Revolution, she has written some really interesting things about it on her website.
Enjoying the "End of Blog Post Means I Have Accomplished Something Today" high,
RR
I am not afraid to say that Daylight Savings Time sucks.
While I am not totally opposed to the general idea or even the implementation, the actual doing of it irritates me. The idea that Time can change, that we affect how the already almost impossible to measure substance running our lives is counted kind of bamboozles my brain.
Another thing running around my brain is revolution. I've been reading books on the French Revolution lately, and it is... disorientating, to say the least, to be able to draw comparisons to present day events in the East, specifically Egypt and Libya.
The only book to come to mind concerning issues of time and political rebellion was Revolution, by Jennifer Donnelly.
Andi, a high school senior, is a pill-popping, emotionally traumatized musical prodigy supporting her mother through a mental breakdown after the death of her younger brother Truman. When her estranged father enters the scene, he swiftly makes a series of decisions that will change Andi's life forever. Putting her mother in a mental hospital to help her recover, he takes Andi to Paris with him for Christmas break, so he can supervise her senior project, and help identify a young boy's heart in a glass jar, rumoured to be that of the last Dauphin - possibly King - of France, Louis-Charles, or Louis XVI, the son of Marie Antoinette.
When Andi stumbles upon a diary from the years of the French Revolution, she is intrigued and captured by Alex, a young aspiring actor who takes a position as companion and joker for Louis-Charles, and later lights fireworks for him when he is imprisoned at the age of ten by the corrupt regime of Robespierre.
I did not expect to like this book as much as I did. I got it as a gift, and my first reaction was basically I liked the author (her earlier YA novel, A Northern Light? SO MANY KINDS OF AWESOMENESS), but the premise (time travel+teen angst) didn't seem particularly appealing.
SO WRONG. (Ah, how I love the taste of literary crow in the mornings..............)
Revolution was crazy good, not only because I love historical fiction (especially the French Revolution, for some reason) but because Andi is a really, really incredible character. She's tortured and moody, but it doesn't feel as tired and boring as the patented "Teenagers + Angst = Guilt + Depression" as a plot device usually is.
An interesting undercurrent and side-plot is Andi's music. She's a talented musician, focused mainly on guitar, and the music the author chooses to mention in the book (from Led Zeppelin to Debussy) never feel like it's just being thrown in to hook People Who Like Music; it just feels like an actual facet of Andi's character.
If you're interested in reading more about Jennifer Donnelly and Revolution, she has written some really interesting things about it on her website.
Enjoying the "End of Blog Post Means I Have Accomplished Something Today" high,
RR
Thursday, April 14, 2011
Beer and Genetics
So, egotistical maniac I am, I've been reading up on this blogging blog's stats.
Disturbingly, the Google searches that have led hapless readers to my clutches are people wondering or trying to find the following:
Disturbingly, the Google searches that have led hapless readers to my clutches are people wondering or trying to find the following:
1. Books where the main character goes on a road trip
2. How to have good looking children
3. I am the messenger sequel
4. Is there always one good looking sibling?
5. Le messenger beer
5. Le messenger beer
6. lemessenger beer
For starters, I am sorry to have misled so many beer aficionados.
I'm pretty sure there isn't a sequel to I am the Messenger, but here's the link to the author's website if you want to explore that a bit further.
To have good looking children, marry someone good looking. (I could do a bit of a rant about loving your children for who they are, but it's been a long morning, so I'll leave you to your imagination on that one.)
I think good looks are fairly objective, but if you want to physically compare yourself to your sibling your entire life, I suggest you start saving for therapy now.
On that cheerful fiscal note, I leave you.
RR
Thursday, April 7, 2011
Review: Water for Elephants
Every once in a while, I read a really lovely book about a time gone by - not so far gone by, but a time almost forgotten. It is one so foreign from our present that it meshes wonderfully with the fiction the author has created.
Water for Elephants, by Sara Gruen, is an excellent example of this. A beautiful novel built around a traveling circus train, it follows the Benzini Brothers Most Spectacular Show on Earth circus during the Great Depression.
Jacob Jankowski, the main character, is a "ninety or ninety-three year-old" rotting away in a nursing home in the present. One of his five children or many grandchildren visit regularly, and he lives a tolerable life, if not an interesting one. Bored by his dull present, he recounts his past with the circus.
At twenty-three, he is about to take his final exams to become a veterinarian at Cornell, when he is told his parents have died in an accident. Unfortunately, he also loses his home and everything in it, as his parents mortgaged the house to pay for Cornell, and his father had been working for food. Desolate and broken, Jacob jumps a train that turns out to be the traveling circus of the Benzini Brothers. (The Benzini Brothers do not actually exist as characters in the book, but their circus was bought by a central character.)
He is hired by the manipulative Uncle Al, head of the circus, as a veterinarian, and becomes friends with August, the unpredictable and frightening head animal trainer, who is married to the mesmerizing and beautiful Marlena. Also featured is Rosie, an elephant spontaneously purchased by Uncle Al. At first, Rosie is badly beaten by August for not obeying commands - until Jacob discovers that Rosie speaks Polish, and will respond to a myriad of commands as long as they are in Polish.
This is not a ground-breaking book. It doesn't unravel any mysteries untouched by man, it doesn't make any sweepingly epic declarations on the state of being human. But it is a beautiful, readable book about a young man, the world of the circus, and his love for a woman and, improbably, an elephant.
Well worth a read if you are into subcultures, animals, true love, and/or historical fiction.
Yours truly,
RR
Water for Elephants, by Sara Gruen, is an excellent example of this. A beautiful novel built around a traveling circus train, it follows the Benzini Brothers Most Spectacular Show on Earth circus during the Great Depression.
Jacob Jankowski, the main character, is a "ninety or ninety-three year-old" rotting away in a nursing home in the present. One of his five children or many grandchildren visit regularly, and he lives a tolerable life, if not an interesting one. Bored by his dull present, he recounts his past with the circus.
At twenty-three, he is about to take his final exams to become a veterinarian at Cornell, when he is told his parents have died in an accident. Unfortunately, he also loses his home and everything in it, as his parents mortgaged the house to pay for Cornell, and his father had been working for food. Desolate and broken, Jacob jumps a train that turns out to be the traveling circus of the Benzini Brothers. (The Benzini Brothers do not actually exist as characters in the book, but their circus was bought by a central character.)
He is hired by the manipulative Uncle Al, head of the circus, as a veterinarian, and becomes friends with August, the unpredictable and frightening head animal trainer, who is married to the mesmerizing and beautiful Marlena. Also featured is Rosie, an elephant spontaneously purchased by Uncle Al. At first, Rosie is badly beaten by August for not obeying commands - until Jacob discovers that Rosie speaks Polish, and will respond to a myriad of commands as long as they are in Polish.
This is not a ground-breaking book. It doesn't unravel any mysteries untouched by man, it doesn't make any sweepingly epic declarations on the state of being human. But it is a beautiful, readable book about a young man, the world of the circus, and his love for a woman and, improbably, an elephant.
Well worth a read if you are into subcultures, animals, true love, and/or historical fiction.
Yours truly,
RR
Friday, March 25, 2011
Planet of the Literary Guilt Monkey Part II
Today I caved to the hype, and checked out a Stieg Larsson - my first, actually. The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo. Multiple friends, family, acquaintances, libraries, and publications have told me that TGWtDT is a book worth reading, but I have just not been able to muster up the urge to WANT to read it. Why? Why, you ask?
(Why yes, I AM blatantly setting this up for a list! How DID you guess???)
WHY I CAN'T SEEM TO READ TGWTDT:
1) It's enormous,
2) the actual main character is a middle-aged man, not someone I easily identify with,
3) the way people say it treats women (not so good), and finally,
4) it's been publicly lauded as fantastic and multiple people have recommended it to me.
For some reason, while I enjoy recommending books, I rarely enjoy books recommended to me. Especially books like TGWtDT, what with it being pasted all over Time, Newsweek, Macleans, Entertainment Weekly, bookstores, libraries, etc. for the last couple of years.
In short, overexposed.
When a book has been as talked about and praised and recommended as TGWtDT, I just find that it never really lives up to my expectations - much like The Hunger Games, by Suzanne Collins. While I acknowledge that both books are good, incredibly good, even, I can't seem appreciate them as much as a book I find on my own. This may tap into my block with Jane Austen books, and is definitely something I would like to one day vanquish as Buffy did so many of the undead.
But New Years is a long time away, so I suppose I will just have to tuck my LitGuilt 2.0 away until December - when I can obsess over it with PURPOSE.
Sincerely,
RR
(Why yes, I AM blatantly setting this up for a list! How DID you guess???)
WHY I CAN'T SEEM TO READ TGWTDT:
1) It's enormous,
2) the actual main character is a middle-aged man, not someone I easily identify with,
3) the way people say it treats women (not so good), and finally,
4) it's been publicly lauded as fantastic and multiple people have recommended it to me.
For some reason, while I enjoy recommending books, I rarely enjoy books recommended to me. Especially books like TGWtDT, what with it being pasted all over Time, Newsweek, Macleans, Entertainment Weekly, bookstores, libraries, etc. for the last couple of years.
In short, overexposed.
When a book has been as talked about and praised and recommended as TGWtDT, I just find that it never really lives up to my expectations - much like The Hunger Games, by Suzanne Collins. While I acknowledge that both books are good, incredibly good, even, I can't seem appreciate them as much as a book I find on my own. This may tap into my block with Jane Austen books, and is definitely something I would like to one day vanquish as Buffy did so many of the undead.
But New Years is a long time away, so I suppose I will just have to tuck my LitGuilt 2.0 away until December - when I can obsess over it with PURPOSE.
Sincerely,
RR
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)